AgentGPT vs Continue
A side-by-side look at AgentGPT and Continue for builders deciding which AI agent fits their stack.
AgentGPT vs Continue: the short version
AgentGPT — AgentGPT lets you spin up autonomous agents directly in the browser. No setup, no installation - just a goal and go. How it works: - Enter a goal in natural language - Agent breaks it into tasks - Executes and iterates autonomously - Shows its thinking and progress Open source and self-hostable. Great for experimenting with autonomous agents without commitment. Powered by the reworkd team.
Continue — Continue is the open-source alternative to Copilot and Cursor. Full control, any model, no vendor lock-in. Key differentiators: - Use any LLM: Claude, GPT-4, Llama, Ollama, etc. - VS Code and JetBrains extensions - Custom slash commands and context providers - Self-host or use their cloud For teams that need flexibility or can't send code to third parties, Continue is the answer. Apache 2.0 licensed.
Frequently asked
Is AgentGPT better than Continue?
It depends on your stack. AgentGPT — Autonomous AI agents in your browser Continue — Open-source AI code assistant The right pick comes down to workflow fit, not a single winner.
What's the difference between AgentGPT and Continue?
AgentGPT is positioned as "Autonomous AI agents in your browser" while Continue is "Open-source AI code assistant". They overlap on Open Source.
Can AgentGPT replace Continue?
For teams already invested in Continue's workflow, AgentGPT is worth trialing where Open Source matters most. Many teams run both.